23/68 CA Art XIII D: Fees & assessments

California Article XIII D: Assessments and property-related fees (Proposition 218)

Lesson 23 of 68 · Taxes, budgets, fees and utilities · 21 min read

On this page (10 sections)
  1. Sections 1–2: Scope and definitions
  2. Section 3: Only four parcel levies
  3. Section 4: Assessments
  4. Section 5: Grandfathered assessments
  5. Section 6: Property-related fees
  6. How courts read it
  7. In Williams
  8. Common misconceptions
  9. Check yourself
  10. Sources cited on this page

Your Williams water, sewer and trash bills are "property-related fees" if they're charged as an incident of owning or occupying property. Article XIII D, §6 sets the rules for how they're adopted and how high they can go Verified1.

Key takeaways

  • Only four levies can be charged to a parcel: the 1% property tax, two-thirds special taxes, XIII D assessments, and XIII D fees (§3).
  • Assessments need a special benefit, an engineer's report, and a mailed ballot weighted by cost; a majority protest kills them (§4).
  • New or higher property-related fees need mailed notice, a hearing at least 45 days later, and no majority written protest (§6(a)).
  • Fee revenue can't exceed the cost of service, can't be diverted, and can't exceed each parcel's proportional cost (§6(b)).
  • Water, sewer and refuse fees skip the separate election; others need one (§6(c)).
  • In court, "the burden shall be on the agency" (§6(b)(5)).

Sections 1–2: Scope and definitions

Official textCal. Const., Art. XIII D, §1read in context: Cal. Const., Art. XIII D, §1

Application. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the provisions of this article shall apply to all assessments, fees and charges, * New Article XIII D adopted November 5, 1996. Initiative measure.

whether imposed pursuant to state statute or local government charter authority. Nothing in this article or Article XIII C shall be construed to:

(a) Provide any new authority to any agency to impose a tax, assessment, fee, or charge.

(b) Affect existing laws relating to the imposition of fees or charges as a condition of property development.

(c) Affect existing laws relating to the imposition of timber yield taxes.

[New section adopted November 5, 1996. Initiative measure.]

Source: California Constitution as published by the California State Senate (current through November 5, 2024) Verified1

Official textCal. Const., Art. XIII D, §2read in context: Cal. Const., Art. XIII D, §2

Definitions. As used in this article:

(a) “Agency” means any local government as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 1 of Article XIII C.

(b) “Assessment” means any levy or charge upon real property by an agency for a special benefit conferred upon the real property. “Assessment” includes, but is not limited to, “special assessment,” “benefit assessment,” “maintenance assessment” and “special assessment tax.”

(c) “Capital cost” means the cost of acquisition, installation, construction, reconstruction, or replacement of a permanent public improvement by an agency.

(d) “District” means an area determined by an agency to contain all parcels which will receive a special benefit from a proposed public improvement or property-related service.

(e) “Fee” or “charge” means any levy other than an ad valorem tax, a special tax, or an assessment, imposed by an agency upon a parcel or upon a person as an incident of property ownership, including a user fee or charge for a property-related service.

(f) “Maintenance and operation expenses” means the cost of rent, repair, replacement, rehabilitation, fuel, power, electrical current, care, and supervision necessary to properly operate and maintain a permanent public improvement.

(g) “Property ownership” shall be deemed to include tenancies of real property where tenants are directly liable to pay the assessment, fee, or charge in question.

(h) “Property-related service” means a public service having a direct relationship to property ownership.

(i) “Special benefit” means a particular and distinct benefit over and above general benefits conferred on real property located in the district or to the public at large. General enhancement of property value does not constitute “special benefit.” [New section adopted November 5, 1996. Initiative measure.]

Source: California Constitution as published by the California State Senate (current through November 5, 2024) Verified1

  • Fee or charge: a levy "imposed by an agency upon a parcel or upon a person as an incident of property ownership, including a user fee or charge for a property-related service" (§2(e)) Verified1.
  • Special benefit: "a particular and distinct benefit over and above general benefits"; "General enhancement of property value does not constitute 'special benefit'" (§2(i)) Verified1.
  • Tenants count where they're directly liable for the charge (§2(g)) Verified1.

Section 3: Only four parcel levies

Official textCal. Const., Art. XIII D, §3read in context: Cal. Const., Art. XIII D, §3

Property Taxes, Assessments, Fees and Charges Limited. (a) No tax, assessment, fee, or charge shall be assessed by any agency upon any parcel of property or upon any person as an incident of property ownership except:

(1) The ad valorem property tax imposed pursuant to Article XIII and Article XIII A.

(2) Any special tax receiving a two-thirds vote pursuant to Section 4 of Article XIII A.

(3) Assessments as provided by this article.

(4) Fees or charges for property-related services as provided by this article.

(b) For purposes of this article, fees for the provision of electrical or gas service shall not be deemed charges or fees imposed as an incident of property ownership. [New section adopted November 5, 1996. Initiative measure.]

Source: California Constitution as published by the California State Senate (current through November 5, 2024) Verified1

Section 4: Assessments

Official textCal. Const., Art. XIII D, §4read in context: Cal. Const., Art. XIII D, §4

Procedures and Requirements for All Assessments. (a) An agency which proposes to levy an assessment shall identify all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed. The proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entirety of the capital cost of a public improvement, the maintenance and operation expenses of a public improvement, or the cost of the property-related service being provided. No assessment shall be imposed on any parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel. Only special benefits are assessable, and an agency shall separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred on a parcel. Parcels within a district that are owned or used by any agency, the State of California or the United States shall not be exempt from assessment unless the agency can demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that those publicly owned parcels in fact receive no special benefit.

(b) All assessments shall be supported by a detailed engineer’s report prepared by a registered professional engineer certified by the State of California.

(c) The amount of the proposed assessment for each identified parcel shall be calculated and the record owner of each parcel shall be given written notice by mail of the proposed assessment, the total amount thereof chargeable to the entire district, the amount chargeable to the owner’s particular parcel, the duration of the payments, the reason for the assessment and the basis upon which the amount of the proposed assessment was calculated, together with the date, time, and location of a public hearing on the proposed assessment. Each notice shall also include, in a conspicuous place thereon, a summary of the procedures applicable to the completion, return, and tabulation of the ballots required pursuant to subdivision (d), including a disclosure statement that the existence of a majority protest, as defined in subdivision (e), will result in the assessment not being imposed.

(d) Each notice mailed to owners of identified parcels within the district pursuant to subdivision (c) shall contain a ballot which includes the agency’s address for receipt of the ballot once completed by any owner receiving the notice whereby the owner may indicate his or her name, reasonable identification of the parcel, and his or her support or opposition to the proposed assessment.

(e) The agency shall conduct a public hearing upon the proposed assessment not less than 45 days after mailing the notice of the proposed assessment to record owners of each identified parcel. At the public hearing, the agency shall consider all protests against the proposed assessment and tabulate the ballots. The agency shall not impose an assessment if there is a majority protest. A majority protest exists if, upon the conclusion of the hearing, ballots submitted in opposition to the assessment exceed the ballots submitted in favor of the assessment. In tabulating the ballots, the ballots shall be weighted according to the proportional financial obligation of the affected property.

(f) In any legal action contesting the validity of any assessment, the burden shall be on the agency to demonstrate that the property or properties in question receive a special benefit over and above the benefits conferred on the public at large and that the amount of any contested assessment is proportional to, and no greater than, the benefits conferred on the property or properties in question.

(g) Because only special benefits are assessable, electors residing within the district who do not own property within the district shall not be deemed under this Constitution to have been deprived of the right to vote for any assessment. If a court determines that the Constitution of the United States or other federal law requires otherwise, the assessment shall not be imposed unless approved by a two-thirds vote of the electorate in the district in addition to being approved by the property owners as required by subdivision (e).

[New section adopted November 5, 1996. Initiative measure.]

Source: California Constitution as published by the California State Senate (current through November 5, 2024) Verified1

  • "Only special benefits are assessable, and an agency shall separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred on a parcel" (§4(a)) Verified1.
  • "All assessments shall be supported by a detailed engineer's report prepared by a registered professional engineer certified by the State of California" (§4(b)) Verified1.
  • "A majority protest exists if, upon the conclusion of the hearing, ballots submitted in opposition to the assessment exceed the ballots submitted in favor of the assessment" (§4(e)), weighted by financial obligation Verified1.
  • Courts review independently. "Proposition 218 requires courts to make an independent review of local agency decisions that are governed by express constitutional provisions" (Silicon Valley Taxpayers' Assn., Inc. v. Santa Clara County Open Space Authority (2008) 44 Cal.4th 431) Verified2.

Section 5: Grandfathered assessments

Official textCal. Const., Art. XIII D, §5read in context: Cal. Const., Art. XIII D, §5

Effective Date. Pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 10 of Article II, the provisions of this article shall become effective the day after the election unless otherwise provided. Beginning July 1, 1997, all existing, new, or increased assessments shall comply with this article. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the following assessments existing on the effective date of this article shall be exempt from the procedures and approval process set forth in Section 4:

(a) Any assessment imposed exclusively to finance the capital costs or maintenance and operation expenses for sidewalks, streets, sewers, water, flood control, drainage systems or vector control. Subsequent increases in such assessments shall be subject to the procedures and approval process set forth in Section 4.

(b) Any assessment imposed pursuant to a petition signed by the persons owning all of the parcels subject to the assessment at the time the assessment is initially imposed. Subsequent increases in such assessments shall be subject to the procedures and approval process set forth in Section 4.

(c) Any assessment the proceeds of which are exclusively used to repay bonded indebtedness of which the failure to pay would violate the Contract Impairment Clause of the Constitution of the United States.

(d) Any assessment which previously received majority voter approval from the voters voting in an election on the issue of the assessment. Subsequent increases in those assessments shall be subject to the procedures and approval process set forth in Section 4. [New section adopted November 5, 1996. Initiative measure.]

Source: California Constitution as published by the California State Senate (current through November 5, 2024) Verified1

Section 6: Property-related fees

Official textCal. Const., Art. XIII D, §6read in context: Cal. Const., Art. XIII D, §6

Property-Related Fees and Charges. (a) Procedures for New or Increased Fees and Charges. An agency shall follow the procedures pursuant to this section in imposing or increasing any fee or charge as defined pursuant to this article, including, but not limited to, the following:

(1) The parcels upon which a fee or charge is proposed for imposition shall be identified. The amount of the fee or charge proposed to be imposed upon each parcel shall be calculated. The agency shall provide written notice by mail of the proposed fee or charge to the record owner of each identified parcel upon which the fee or charge is proposed for imposition, the amount of the fee or charge proposed to be imposed upon each, the basis upon which the amount of the proposed fee or charge was calculated, the reason for the fee or charge, together with the date, time, and location of a public hearing on the proposed fee or charge.

(2) The agency shall conduct a public hearing upon the proposed fee or charge not less than 45 days after mailing the notice of the proposed fee or charge to the record owners of each identified parcel upon which the fee or charge is proposed for imposition. At the public hearing, the agency shall consider all protests against the proposed fee or charge. If written protests against the proposed fee or charge are presented by a majority of owners of the identified parcels, the agency shall not impose the fee or charge.

(b) Requirements for Existing, New or Increased Fees and Charges. A fee or charge shall not be extended, imposed, or increased by any agency unless it meets all of the following requirements:

(1) Revenues derived from the fee or charge shall not exceed the funds required to provide the property-related service.

(2) Revenues derived from the fee or charge shall not be used for any purpose other than that for which the fee or charge was imposed.

(3) The amount of a fee or charge imposed upon any parcel or person as an incident of property ownership shall not exceed the proportional cost of the service attributable to the parcel.

(4) No fee or charge may be imposed for a service unless that service is actually used by, or immediately available to, the owner of the property in question. Fees or charges based on potential or future use of a service are not permitted. Standby charges, whether characterized as charges or assessments, shall be classified as assessments and shall not be imposed without compliance with Section 4.

(5) No fee or charge may be imposed for general governmental services including, but not limited to, police, fire, ambulance or library services,

where the service is available to the public at large in substantially the same manner as it is to property owners.

Reliance by an agency on any parcel map, including, but not limited to, an assessor’s parcel map, may be considered a significant factor in determining whether a fee or charge is imposed as an incident of property ownership for purposes of this article. In any legal action contesting the validity of a fee or charge, the burden shall be on the agency to demonstrate compliance with this article.

(c) Voter Approval for New or Increased Fees and Charges. Except for fees or charges for sewer, water, and refuse collection services, no property-related fee or charge shall be imposed or increased unless and until that fee or charge is submitted and approved by a majority vote of the property owners of the property subject to the fee or charge or, at the option of the agency, by a two-thirds vote of the electorate residing in the affected area. The election shall be conducted not less than 45 days after the public hearing. An agency may adopt procedures similar to those for increases in assessments in the conduct of elections under this subdivision.

(d) Beginning July 1, 1997, all fees or charges shall comply with this section. [New section adopted November 5, 1996. Initiative measure.]

Source: California Constitution as published by the California State Senate (current through November 5, 2024) Verified1

The procedure (§6(a))

  1. Identify the parcels and calculate each one's fee.
  2. Mail written notice to each record owner with the amount, the basis, the reason, and the hearing date.
  3. Hold a public hearing "not less than 45 days after mailing the notice."
  4. "If written protests against the proposed fee or charge are presented by a majority of owners of the identified parcels, the agency shall not impose the fee or charge."

Source: Verified1

The substantive limits (§6(b))

  • "Revenues derived from the fee or charge shall not exceed the funds required to provide the property-related service."
  • Revenues "shall not be used for any purpose other than that for which the fee or charge was imposed."
  • The fee "shall not exceed the proportional cost of the service attributable to the parcel."
  • "No fee or charge may be imposed for a service unless that service is actually used by, or immediately available to, the owner of the property in question. Fees or charges based on potential or future use of a service are not permitted."
  • "No fee or charge may be imposed for general governmental services including, but not limited to, police, fire, ambulance or library services, where the service is available to the public at large in substantially the same manner as it is to property owners."
  • "In any legal action contesting the validity of a fee or charge, the burden shall be on the agency to demonstrate compliance with this article."

Source: Verified1

The vote (§6(c))

"Except for fees or charges for sewer, water, and refuse collection services, no property-related fee or charge shall be imposed or increased unless and until that fee or charge is submitted and approved by a majority vote of the property owners ... or, at the option of the agency, by a two-thirds vote of the electorate residing in the affected area" Verified1.

How courts read it

Case Holding (quoted)
Apartment Assn. v. Los Angeles (2001) Asked "whether a city ordinance imposing an inspection fee on private landlords violates article XIII D" and answered: "We conclude that it does not" (Apartment Assn. of Los Angeles County, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles (2001) 24 Cal.4th 830) Verified3
Richmond v. Shasta CSD (2004) "a capacity charge imposed as a condition for making a new connection to a water system ... is not an assessment within the meaning of article XIII D" (Richmond v. Shasta Community Services Dist. (2004) 32 Cal.4th 409) Verified4
Bighorn v. Verjil (2006) Voters may reduce water rates by initiative under XIII C §3 Verified5
Capistrano Taxpayers (2015) Tiered water rates are allowed, but "the tiers must still correspond to the actual cost of providing service at a given level of usage" (Capistrano Taxpayers Assn., Inc. v. City of San Juan Capistrano (2015) 235 Cal.App.4th 1493) Verified6
HJTA v. Salinas (2002) A storm drainage fee was a property-related fee needing voter approval; the court noted voters intended the provision "be construed liberally to curb the rise in 'excessive' taxes" (Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Assn. v. City of Salinas (2002) 98 Cal.App.4th 1351) Verified7
HJTA v. Roseville (2002) A 4% "in-lieu franchise fee" on city water, sewer and refuse transferred to the general fund fell within §6: "We conclude the in-lieu fee is within this definition" (Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Assn. v. City of Roseville (2002) 97 Cal.App.4th 637) Verified8

Our reading: Apartment Assn. treated a fee on landlords as a business, not an incident of owning property; fees tied to an activity rather than to ownership may fall outside §6.

In Williams

  • Water and sewer rate increases. Watch for the mailed notice; you have until the end of the hearing to file a written protest. If a majority of parcels protest, the increase fails (§6(a)(2)) Verified1.
  • Ask for the rate study. The city must show revenue doesn't exceed cost and each parcel's share is proportional (§6(b)) Verified1.
  • Transfers to the general fund from utility funds raise Roseville questions Verified8.
  • State statute. The Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act adds procedure (Gov. Code §53750 and following, notice in §53755) Verified910.

Common misconceptions

  • "Water rates need a public vote." Not under §6(c); they need the notice, hearing and protest process Verified1.
  • "Any benefit to property justifies an assessment." Only special benefits; "General enhancement of property value does not constitute 'special benefit'" Verified1.

Check yourself

Pick an answer for each question. You will see right away if it is right, and why.

Question 1. How long after mailing notice must the fee hearing be?

Show the answer and why

At least 45 days (§6(a)(2)) Verified1.

Question 2. What happens if a majority of parcel owners file written protests?

Show the answer and why

"The agency shall not impose the fee or charge" (§6(a)(2)) Verified1.

Question 3. Can a property-related fee pay for police?

Show the answer and why

Not where the service is available to the public at large in substantially the same manner (§6(b)(5)) Verified1.

Question 4. Which fees are exempt from the §6(c) election?

Show the answer and why

Sewer, water and refuse collection Verified1.

Question 5. Who has the burden in a lawsuit over a fee?

Show the answer and why

The agency Verified1.

Question 6. Put the steps in order: Suppose the city proposes a higher property-related fee. Put the steps in order.
  1. The city mails notice of the proposed fee
  2. The city holds the public hearing
  3. Written protests are counted: a majority protest stops the fee
  4. At least 45 days pass

Show the answer and why

The right order:

  1. The city mails notice of the proposed fee
  2. At least 45 days pass
  3. The city holds the public hearing
  4. Written protests are counted: a majority protest stops the fee

New or higher property-related fees need mailed notice, a hearing at least 45 days later, and no majority written protest (§6(a)).

From this lesson: “New or higher property-related fees need mailed notice, a hearing at least 45 days later, and no majority written protest (§6(a)).”

Sources cited on this page

  1. Constitutions of California and the United States, 2025-26 edition (PDF) (California State Senate; official; accessed 2026-10-17) California Constitution as last amended November 5, 2024. ↗
  2. Silicon Valley Taxpayers' Assn., Inc. v. Santa Clara County Open Space Authority (2008) 44 Cal.4th 431 (Caselaw Access Project, Harvard Law School (copy of California opinion); unofficial / third-party; accessed 2026-10-23) Full opinion text read in the Caselaw Access Project copy. Quotes on this site were machine-checked against that text. ↗
  3. Apartment Assn. of Los Angeles County, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles (2001) 24 Cal.4th 830 (Caselaw Access Project, Harvard Law School (copy of California opinion); unofficial / third-party; accessed 2026-10-23) Full opinion text read in the Caselaw Access Project copy. Quotes on this site were machine-checked against that text. ↗
  4. Richmond v. Shasta Community Services Dist. (2004) 32 Cal.4th 409 (Caselaw Access Project, Harvard Law School (copy of California opinion); unofficial / third-party; accessed 2026-10-23) Full opinion text read in the Caselaw Access Project copy. Quotes on this site were machine-checked against that text. ↗
  5. Bighorn-Desert View Water Agency v. Verjil (2006) 39 Cal.4th 205 (CourtListener / Harvard Caselaw Access Project (scan of California Reports); unofficial / third-party; accessed 2026-10-23) Opinion text read on a free copy, not the official reporter. Confirm before relying on it. ↗
  6. Capistrano Taxpayers Assn., Inc. v. City of San Juan Capistrano (2015) 235 Cal.App.4th 1493 (Caselaw Access Project, Harvard Law School (copy of California opinion); unofficial / third-party; accessed 2026-10-23) Full opinion text read in the Caselaw Access Project copy. Quotes on this site were machine-checked against that text. ↗
  7. Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Assn. v. City of Salinas (2002) 98 Cal.App.4th 1351 (Caselaw Access Project, Harvard Law School (copy of California opinion); unofficial / third-party; accessed 2026-10-23) Full opinion text read in the Caselaw Access Project copy. Quotes on this site were machine-checked against that text. ↗
  8. Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Assn. v. City of Roseville (2002) 97 Cal.App.4th 637 (Caselaw Access Project, Harvard Law School (copy of California opinion); unofficial / third-party; accessed 2026-10-23) Full opinion text read in the Caselaw Access Project copy. Quotes on this site were machine-checked against that text. ↗
  9. Government Code §53750 (Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act: definitions) (California.Public.Law (copy of California statute); unofficial / third-party; accessed 2026-10-23) Unofficial copy of the statute, read directly. Confirm on leginfo before relying on it. ↗
  10. Government Code §53755 (Proposition 218: notice of property-related fee increases) (California.Public.Law (copy of California statute); unofficial / third-party; accessed 2026-10-23) Unofficial copy of the statute, read directly. Confirm on leginfo before relying on it. ↗

Page last updated: · Site last built: