California Article I (part 3): Criminal justice rights
On this page (16 sections)
- Section 12: Bail
- Section 13: Searches and seizures
- Section 14: Charging felonies
- Section 15: Defendants' rights
- Section 16: Jury trial
- Section 17: Cruel or unusual punishment; excessive fines
- Section 18: Treason
- Section 23: Grand juries
- Section 24: Independent rights and the criminal-case limit
- Section 27: Death penalty
- Section 28: Victims' Bill of Rights and Truth-in-Evidence
- Sections 29, 30 and 32
- In Williams
- Common misconceptions
- Check yourself
- Sources cited on this page
California's criminal-justice rights look like the federal Fourth, Fifth, Sixth and Eighth Amendments, but voters have changed them several times. The biggest change: since 1982's "Truth-in-Evidence" rule, California courts generally can't exclude evidence unless federal law requires it.
Key takeaways
- §13 matches the Fourth Amendment almost word for word, and covers code-enforcement entries.
- §17 bans "cruel or unusual" punishment and excessive fines; it applies to city penalties.
- §28(f)(2) means evidence is excluded only when federal law requires it (In re Lance W.).
- §24's sentence forcing state courts to follow federal rules for all criminal rights was struck down as an invalid revision (Raven), but its "consistent with" sentence remains in the text.
- City code violations prosecuted as misdemeanors or infractions get these protections.
Section 12: Bail
A person shall be released on bail by sufficient sureties, except for:
(a) Capital crimes when the facts are evident or the presumption great;
(b) Felony offenses involving acts of violence on another person, or felony sexual assault offenses on another person, when the facts are evident or the presumption great and the court finds based upon clear and convincing
evidence that there is a substantial likelihood the person’s release would result in great bodily harm to others; or
(c) Felony offenses when the facts are evident or the presumption great and the court finds based on clear and convincing evidence that the person has threatened another with great bodily harm and that there is a substantial likelihood that the person would carry out the threat if released. Excessive bail may not be required. In fixing the amount of bail, the court shall take into consideration the seriousness of the offense charged, the previous criminal record of the defendant, and the probability of his or her appearing at the trial or hearing of the case. A person may be released on his or her own recognizance in the court’s discretion. [As amended November 8, 1994.]
Source: California Constitution as published by the California State Senate (current through November 5, 2024) Verified1
Bail is a right except for listed serious crimes. Courts may also release a person "on his or her own recognizance" at their discretion Verified1. See the Eighth Amendment.
Section 13: Searches and seizures
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable seizures and searches may not be violated; and a warrant may not issue except on probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, particularly describing the place to be searched and the persons and things to be seized. [New section adopted November 5, 1974.]
Source: California Constitution as published by the California State Senate (current through November 5, 2024) Verified1
Before 1982, California courts read §13 more broadly than the Fourth Amendment. In People v. Brisendine (1975), officers could pat down for weapons, but "the officers' subsequent intrusion into the opaque bottle and envelopes inside the knapsack cannot be justified by the limited purpose which validated the search in its inception" (People v. Brisendine (1975) 13 Cal.3d 528) Verified2.
After 1982, §28(f)(2) limited exclusion to what federal law requires; see §28.
Code enforcement. "In the absence of consent or exigent circumstances, government officials engaged in the abatement of a public nuisance must have a warrant to enter any private property where such entry would invade a constitutionally protected privacy interest" (Gleaves v. Waters (1985) 175 Cal.App.3d 413) Verified3. Inspection warrants require cause under Code Civ. Proc. §1822.52 Verified4. See Williams: entry and the Fourth Amendment.
Section 14: Charging felonies
Felonies shall be prosecuted as provided by law, either by indictment or, after examination and commitment by a magistrate, by information. A person charged with a felony by complaint subscribed under penalty of perjury and on file in a court in the county where the felony is triable shall be taken without unnecessary delay before a magistrate of that court. The magistrate shall immediately give the defendant a copy of the complaint, inform the defendant of the defendant’s right to counsel, allow the defendant a reasonable time to send for counsel, and on the defendant’s request read the complaint to the defendant. On the defendant’s request the magistrate shall require a peace officer to transmit within the county where the court is located a message to counsel named by defendant.
A person unable to understand English who is charged with a crime has a right to an interpreter throughout the proceedings. [New section adopted November 5, 1974.]
Source: California Constitution as published by the California State Senate (current through November 5, 2024) Verified1
If a felony is prosecuted by indictment, there shall be no postindictment preliminary hearing. [New section adopted June 5, 1990. Initiative measure.]
Source: California Constitution as published by the California State Senate (current through November 5, 2024) Verified1
Felonies are charged by grand jury indictment or by a prosecutor's "information" after a preliminary hearing. That's allowed because the federal grand jury right isn't incorporated (Hurtado v. California, 110 U.S. 516 (1884)) Verified5.
Section 15: Defendants' rights
The defendant in a criminal cause has the right to a speedy public trial, to compel attendance of witnesses in the defendant’s behalf, to have the assistance of counsel for the defendant’s defense, to be personally present with counsel, and to be confronted with the witnesses against the defendant. The Legislature may provide for the deposition of a witness in the presence of the defendant and the defendant’s counsel. Persons may not twice be put in jeopardy for the same offense, be compelled in a criminal cause to be a witness against themselves, or be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law. [New section adopted November 5, 1974.]
Source: California Constitution as published by the California State Senate (current through November 5, 2024) Verified1
Speedy public trial, witnesses, counsel, confrontation, no double jeopardy, no self-incrimination, due process Verified1. State due process protects against "arbitrary adjudicative procedures" (People v. Ramirez (1979) 25 Cal.3d 260) Verified6.
Section 16: Jury trial
Trial by jury is an inviolate right and shall be secured to all, but in a civil cause three-fourths of the jury may render a verdict. A jury may be waived in a criminal cause by the consent of both parties expressed in open court by the defendant and the defendant’s counsel. In a civil cause a jury may be waived by the consent of the parties expressed as prescribed by statute.
In civil causes the jury shall consist of 12 persons or a lesser number agreed on by the parties in open court. In civil causes other than causes within the appellate jurisdiction of the court of appeal the Legislature may provide that the jury shall consist of eight persons or a lesser number agreed on by the parties in open court.
In criminal actions in which a felony is charged, the jury shall consist of 12 persons. In criminal actions in which a misdemeanor is charged, the jury shall consist of 12 persons or a lesser number agreed on by the parties in open court. [As amended June 2, 1998.]
Source: California Constitution as published by the California State Senate (current through November 5, 2024) Verified1
- Civil juries. Unlike the Seventh Amendment, which doesn't bind states, §16 guarantees civil jury trial in California, with three-fourths agreement enough for a civil verdict Verified1.
- Representative juries. "The use of peremptory challenges to remove prospective jurors on the sole ground of group bias violates the right to trial by a jury drawn from a representative cross-section of the community under article I, section 16" (People v. Wheeler (1978) 22 Cal.3d 258) Verified7.
- Misdemeanor juries. §16 sets jury size for misdemeanors; see the text Verified1.
Section 17: Cruel or unusual punishment; excessive fines
Cruel or unusual punishment may not be inflicted or excessive fines imposed. [New section adopted November 5, 1974.]
Source: California Constitution as published by the California State Senate (current through November 5, 2024) Verified1
"Or," not "and." The federal Eighth Amendment says "cruel and unusual" Verified8.
Fines. "The touchstone of the constitutional inquiry under the Excessive Fines Clause is the principle of proportionality," weighing "(1) the defendant's culpability; (2) the relationship between the harm and the penalty; (3) the penalties imposed in similar statutes; and (4) the defendant's ability to pay" (People ex rel. Lockyer v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. (2005) 37 Cal.4th 707) Verified9.
Daily penalties. In Hale v. Morgan (1978) 22 Cal.3d 388, a $100-a-day penalty had reached $17,300. Such a "mandatory, fixed, substantial and cumulative punitive sanction against persons of such disparate culpability is manifestly suspect" Verified10. See Williams: fines.
Ability to pay. People v. Dueñas (2019), a Court of Appeal decision, held that "due process of law requires the trial court to conduct an ability to pay hearing" before imposing certain court assessments (People v. Dueñas (2019) 30 Cal.App.5th 1157) Verified11. Other appellate courts have disagreed about its reach; we haven't surveyed them, so read the later cases before relying on it Unverified12.
Section 18: Treason
Treason against the State consists only in levying war against it, adhering to its enemies, or giving them aid and comfort. A person may not be convicted of treason except on the evidence of two witnesses to the
same overt act or by confession in open court. [New section adopted November 5, 1974.]
Source: California Constitution as published by the California State Senate (current through November 5, 2024) Verified1
Section 23: Grand juries
One or more grand juries shall be drawn and summoned at least once a year in each county. [New section adopted November 5, 1974.]
Source: California Constitution as published by the California State Senate (current through November 5, 2024) Verified1
Every county, including Colusa, must summon at least one grand jury a year Verified1. Our reading: California civil grand juries also investigate local government; check the Penal Code for their watchdog role over cities.
Section 24: Independent rights and the criminal-case limit
Rights guaranteed by this Constitution are not dependent on those guaranteed by the United States Constitution.
In criminal cases the rights of a defendant to equal protection of the laws, to due process of law, to the assistance of counsel, to be personally present with counsel, to a speedy and public trial, to compel the attendance of witnesses, to confront the witnesses against him or her, to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures, to privacy, to not be compelled to be a witness against himself or herself, to not be placed twice in jeopardy for the same offense, and to not suffer the imposition of cruel or unusual punishment, shall be construed by the courts of this State in a manner consistent with the Constitution of the United States. This Constitution shall not be construed by the courts to afford greater rights to criminal defendants than those afforded by the Constitution of the United States, nor shall it be construed to afford greater rights to minors in juvenile proceedings on criminal causes than those afforded by the Constitution of the United States. This declaration of rights may not be construed to impair or deny others retained by the people. [As amended June 5, 1990. Initiative measure.]
Source: California Constitution as published by the California State Senate (current through November 5, 2024) Verified1
First sentence: state rights stand on their own Verified1.
Second paragraph: added by Proposition 115 (1990). The printed text includes the sentence that "This Constitution shall not be construed by the courts to afford greater rights to criminal defendants than those afforded by the Constitution of the United States" Verified1. The California Supreme Court held "that new article I, section 24, represents an invalid revision of the California Constitution" but "its invalidity does not affect the remaining provisions of Proposition 115" (Raven v. Deukmejian (1990) 52 Cal.3d 336) Verified13. Our reading: the paragraph still appears in the official publication but was held invalid; don't rely on it.
Section 27: Death penalty
All statutes of this State in effect on February 17, 1972, requiring, authorizing, imposing, or relating to the death penalty are in full force and effect, subject to legislative amendment or repeal by statute, initiative, or referendum.
The death penalty provided for under those statutes shall not be deemed to be, or to constitute, the infliction of cruel or unusual punishments within the meaning of Article 1, Section 6 nor shall such punishment for such offenses be deemed to contravene any other provision of this constitution.
[New section adopted November 7, 1972. Initiative measure.]
Source: California Constitution as published by the California State Senate (current through November 5, 2024) Verified1
Section 28: Victims' Bill of Rights and Truth-in-Evidence
(a) The People of the State of California find and declare all of the following:
(1) Criminal activity has a serious impact on the citizens of California. The rights of victims of crime and their families in criminal prosecutions are a subject of grave statewide concern.
(2) Victims of crime are entitled to have the criminal justice system view criminal acts as serious threats to the safety and welfare of the people of
California. The enactment of comprehensive provisions and laws ensuring a bill of rights for victims of crime, including safeguards in the criminal justice system fully protecting those rights and ensuring that crime victims are treated with respect and dignity, is a matter of high public importance. California’s victims of crime are largely dependent upon the proper functioning of government, upon the criminal justice system and upon the expeditious enforcement of the rights of victims of crime described herein, in order to protect the public safety and to secure justice when the public safety has been compromised by criminal activity.
(3) The rights of victims pervade the criminal justice system. These rights include personally held and enforceable rights described in paragraphs (1) through (17) of subdivision (b).
(4) The rights of victims also include broader shared collective rights that are held in common with all of the People of the State of California and that are enforceable through the enactment of laws and through good-faith efforts and actions of California’s elected, appointed, and publicly employed officials. These rights encompass the expectation shared with all of the people of California that persons who commit felonious acts causing injury to innocent victims will be appropriately and thoroughly investigated, appropriately detained in custody, brought before the courts of California even if arrested outside the State, tried by the courts in a timely manner, sentenced, and sufficiently punished so that the public safety is protected and encouraged as a goal of highest importance.
(5) Victims of crime have a collectively shared right to expect that persons convicted of committing criminal acts are sufficiently punished in both the manner and the length of the sentences imposed by the courts of the State of California. This right includes the right to expect that the punitive and deterrent effect of custodial sentences imposed by the courts will not be undercut or diminished by the granting of rights and privileges to prisoners that are not required by any provision of the United States Constitution or by the laws of this State to be granted to any person incarcerated in a penal or other custodial facility in this State as a punishment or correction for the commission of a crime.
(6) Victims of crime are entitled to finality in their criminal cases. Lengthy appeals and other post-judgment proceedings that challenge criminal convictions, frequent and difficult parole hearings that threaten to release criminal offenders, and the ongoing threat that the sentences of criminal wrongdoers will be reduced, prolong the suffering of crime victims for many years after the crimes themselves have been perpetrated. This prolonged suffering of crime victims and their families must come to an end.
(7) Finally, the People find and declare that the right to public safety extends to public and private primary, elementary, junior high, and senior high school, and community college, California State University, University of
California, and private college and university campuses, where students and staff have the right to be safe and secure in their persons.
(8) To accomplish the goals it is necessary that the laws of California relating to the criminal justice process be amended in order to protect the legitimate rights of victims of crime.
(b) In order to preserve and protect a victim’s rights to justice and due process, a victim shall be entitled to the following rights:
(1) To be treated with fairness and respect for his or her privacy and dignity, and to be free from intimidation, harassment, and abuse, throughout the criminal or juvenile justice process.
(2) To be reasonably protected from the defendant and persons acting on behalf of the defendant.
(3) To have the safety of the victim and the victim’s family considered in fixing the amount of bail and release conditions for the defendant.
(4) To prevent the disclosure of confidential information or records to the defendant, the defendant’s attorney, or any other person acting on behalf of the defendant, which could be used to locate or harass the victim or the victim’s family or which disclose confidential communications made in the course of medical or counseling treatment, or which are otherwise privileged or confidential by law.
(5) To refuse an interview, deposition, or discovery request by the defendant, the defendant’s attorney, or any other person acting on behalf of the defendant, and to set reasonable conditions on the conduct of any such interview to which the victim consents.
(6) To reasonable notice of and to reasonably confer with the prosecuting agency, upon request, regarding, the arrest of the defendant if known by the prosecutor, the charges filed, the determination whether to extradite the defendant, and, upon request, to be notified of and informed before any pretrial disposition of the case.
(7) To reasonable notice of all public proceedings, including delinquency proceedings, upon request, at which the defendant and the prosecutor are entitled to be present and of all parole or other post-conviction release proceedings, and to be present at all such proceedings.
(8) To be heard, upon request, at any proceeding, including any delinquency proceeding, involving a post-arrest release decision, plea, sentencing, post-conviction release decision, or any proceeding in which a right of the victim is at issue.
(9) To a speedy trial and a prompt and final conclusion of the case and any related post-judgment proceedings.
(10) To provide information to a probation department official conducting a pre-sentence investigation concerning the impact of the offense on the victim and the victim’s family and any sentencing recommendations before the sentencing of the defendant.
(11) To receive, upon request, the pre-sentence report when available to the defendant, except for those portions made confidential by law.
(12) To be informed, upon request, of the conviction, sentence, place and time of incarceration, or other disposition of the defendant, the scheduled release date of the defendant, and the release of or the escape by the defendant from custody.
(13) To restitution.
(A) It is the unequivocal intention of the People of the State of California that all persons who suffer losses as a result of criminal activity shall have the right to seek and secure restitution from the persons convicted of the crimes causing the losses they suffer.
(B) Restitution shall be ordered from the convicted wrongdoer in every case, regardless of the sentence or disposition imposed, in which a crime victim suffers a loss.
(C) All monetary payments, monies, and property collected from any person who has been ordered to make restitution shall be first applied to pay the amounts ordered as restitution to the victim.
(14) To the prompt return of property when no longer needed as evidence.
(15) To be informed of all parole procedures, to participate in the parole process, to provide information to the parole authority to be considered before the parole of the offender, and to be notified, upon request, of the parole or other release of the offender.
(16) To have the safety of the victim, the victim’s family, and the general public considered before any parole or other post-judgment release decision is made.
(17) To be informed of the rights enumerated in paragraphs (1) through
(16).
(c) (1) A victim, the retained attorney of a victim, a lawful representative of the victim, or the prosecuting attorney upon request of the victim, may enforce the rights enumerated in subdivision (b) in any trial or appellate court with jurisdiction over the case as a matter of right. The court shall act promptly on such a request.
(2) This section does not create any cause of action for compensation or damages against the State, any political subdivision of the State, any officer, employee, or agent of the State or of any of its political subdivisions, or any officer or employee of the court.
(d) The granting of these rights to victims shall not be construed to deny or disparage other rights possessed by victims. The court in its discretion may extend the right to be heard at sentencing to any person harmed by the defendant. The parole authority shall extend the right to be heard at a parole hearing to any person harmed by the offender.
(e) As used in this section, a “victim” is a person who suffers direct or threatened physical, psychological, or financial harm as a result of the commission or attempted commission of a crime or delinquent act. The term “victim” also includes the person’s spouse, parents, children, siblings, or guardian, and includes a lawful representative of a crime victim who is deceased, a minor, or physically or psychologically incapacitated. The term “victim” does not include a person in custody for an offense, the accused, or a person whom the court finds would not act in the best interests of a minor victim.
(f) In addition to the enumerated rights provided in subdivision (b) that are personally enforceable by victims as provided in subdivision (c), victims of crime have additional rights that are shared with all of the People of the State of California. These collectively held rights include, but are not limited to, the following:
(1) Right to Safe Schools. All students and staff of public primary, elementary, junior high, and senior high schools, and community colleges, colleges, and universities have the inalienable right to attend campuses which are safe, secure and peaceful.
(2) Right to Truth-in-Evidence. Except as provided by statute hereafter enacted by a two-thirds vote of the membership in each house of the Legislature, relevant evidence shall not be excluded in any criminal proceeding, including pretrial and post conviction motions and hearings, or in any trial or hearing of a juvenile for a criminal offense, whether heard in juvenile or adult court. Nothing in this section shall affect any existing statutory rule of evidence relating to privilege or hearsay, or Evidence Code Sections 352, 782 or 1103. Nothing in this section shall affect any existing statutory or constitutional right of the press.
(3) Public Safety Bail. A person may be released on bail by sufficient sureties, except for capital crimes when the facts are evident or the presumption great. Excessive bail may not be required. In setting, reducing or denying bail, the judge or magistrate shall take into consideration the protection of the public, the safety of the victim, the seriousness of the offense charged, the previous criminal record of the defendant, and the probability of his or her appearing at the trial or hearing of the case. Public safety and the safety of the victim shall be the primary considerations.
A person may be released on his or her own recognizance in the court’s discretion, subject to the same factors considered in setting bail. Before any person arrested for a serious felony may be released on bail, a hearing may be held before the magistrate or judge, and the prosecuting attorney and the victim shall be given notice and reasonable opportunity to be heard on the matter.
When a judge or magistrate grants or denies bail or release on a person’s own recognizance, the reasons for that decision shall be stated in the record and included in the court’s minutes.
(4) Use of Prior Convictions. Any prior felony conviction of any person in any criminal proceeding, whether adult or juvenile, shall subsequently be used without limitation for purposes of impeachment or enhancement of sentence in any criminal proceeding. When a prior felony conviction is an element of any felony offense, it shall be proven to the trier of fact in open court.
(5) Truth in Sentencing. Sentences that are individually imposed upon convicted criminal wrongdoers based upon the facts and circumstances surrounding their cases shall be carried out in compliance with the courts’ sentencing orders, and shall not be substantially diminished by early release policies intended to alleviate overcrowding in custodial facilities. The legislative branch shall ensure sufficient funding to adequately house inmates for the full terms of their sentences, except for statutorily authorized credits which reduce those sentences.
(6) Reform of the parole process. The current process for parole hearings is excessive, especially in cases in which the defendant has been convicted of murder. The parole hearing process must be reformed for the benefit of crime victims.
(g) As used in this article, the term “serious felony” is any crime defined in subdivision (c) of Section 1192.7 of the Penal Code, or any successor statute. [As amended November 4, 2008. Initiative measure.]
Source: California Constitution as published by the California State Senate (current through November 5, 2024) Verified1
The section's centerpiece is a list of victims' rights in §28(b). For everyone else, the key part is §28(f)(2), Truth-in-Evidence: "relevant evidence shall not be excluded in any criminal proceeding," with listed exceptions Verified1. The court held this "abrogated both the 'vicarious exclusionary rule' ... and a defendant's right" to exclude evidence under state-only search rules (In re Lance W. (1985) 37 Cal.3d 873) Verified14. Our reading: Brisendine-style broader state rules may still define what's unlawful, but evidence generally comes in unless federal law requires exclusion Verified14.
Sections 29, 30 and 32
In a criminal case, the people of the State of California have the right to due process of law and to a speedy and public trial. [New section adopted June 5, 1990. Initiative measure.]
Source: California Constitution as published by the California State Senate (current through November 5, 2024) Verified1
(a) This Constitution shall not be construed by the courts to prohibit the joining of criminal cases as prescribed by the Legislature or by the people through the initiative process.
(b) In order to protect victims and witnesses in criminal cases, hearsay evidence shall be admissible at preliminary hearings, as prescribed by the Legislature or by the people through the initiative process.
(c) In order to provide for fair and speedy trials, discovery in criminal cases shall be reciprocal in nature, as prescribed by the Legislature or by the people through the initiative process. [New section adopted June 5, 1990. Initiative measure.]
Source: California Constitution as published by the California State Senate (current through November 5, 2024) Verified1
(a) The following provisions are hereby enacted to enhance public safety, improve rehabilitation, and avoid the release of prisoners by federal court order, notwithstanding anything in this article or any other provision of law:
(1) Parole Consideration: any person convicted of a nonviolent felony offense and sentenced to state prison shall be eligible for parole consideration after completing the full term for his or her primary offense.
(A) For purposes of this section only, the full term for the primary offense means the longest term of imprisonment imposed by the court for any offense, excluding the imposition of an enhancement, consecutive sentence, or alternative sentence.
(2) Credit Earning: The Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation shall have authority to award credits earned for good behavior and approved rehabilitative or educational achievements.
(b) The Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation shall adopt regulations in furtherance of these provisions, and the Secretary of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation shall certify that these regulations protect and enhance public safety. [New Section adopted November 8, 2016. Initiative measure.]
Source: California Constitution as published by the California State Senate (current through November 5, 2024) Verified1
§29 gives the people due process and a speedy trial. §30 allows joinder and some hearsay at preliminary hearings. §32, adopted by initiative November 8, 2016, provides parole consideration for nonviolent felony offenders Verified1.
In Williams
- Code prosecutions. A Williams ordinance violation can be charged as a misdemeanor or infraction (Gov. Code §36900) Verified15. The defendant gets §§15–17 protections. See Williams: charging.
- Inspections. Entry without consent or emergency needs a warrant Verified34.
- Fines. Daily accruing penalties face §17 and due process limits Verified109.
Common misconceptions
- "California's search rules exclude more evidence than federal rules." Not since 1982 Verified14.
- "§24 bars state courts from giving defendants more rights." That sentence was held invalid in Raven Verified13.
Check yourself
Pick an answer for each question. You will see right away if it is right, and why.
Show the answer and why
Truth-in-Evidence (§28(f)(2)) limited exclusion to what federal law requires (In re Lance W.) Verified14.
Show the answer and why
Yes, it bars excessive fines; courts weigh culpability, harm, similar penalties and ability to pay Verified9.
Show the answer and why
§14 allows charging by information, and the federal grand jury right isn't incorporated Verified5.
Show the answer and why
Yes, absent consent or exigent circumstances (Gleaves v. Waters) Verified3.
Show the answer and why
Answer: §17, which bans excessive fines and applies to city penalties.
§17 bans "cruel or unusual" punishment and excessive fines; it applies to city penalties.
From this lesson: “§17 bans "cruel or unusual" punishment and excessive fines; it applies to city penalties.”
Sources cited on this page
- Constitutions of California and the United States, 2025-26 edition (PDF) California Constitution as last amended November 5, 2024. ↗
- People v. Brisendine (1975) 13 Cal.3d 528 Full opinion text read in the Caselaw Access Project copy. Quotes on this site were machine-checked against that text. ↗
- Gleaves v. Waters (1985) 175 Cal.App.3d 413 Opinion text read on a free copy, not the official reporter. Confirm before relying on it. ↗
- Code of Civil Procedure §1822.52 (inspection warrants: cause) Unofficial copy of the statute, read directly. Confirm on leginfo before relying on it. ↗
- Hurtado v. California, 110 U.S. 516 (1884) Full opinion text read on the LII copy. Quotes on this site were machine-checked against that text. ↗
- People v. Ramirez (1979) 25 Cal.3d 260 Full opinion text read in the Caselaw Access Project copy. Quotes on this site were machine-checked against that text. ↗
- People v. Wheeler (1978) 22 Cal.3d 258 Full opinion text read in the Caselaw Access Project copy. Quotes on this site were machine-checked against that text. ↗
- The Bill of Rights: A Transcription ↗
- People ex rel. Lockyer v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. (2005) 37 Cal.4th 707 Copy of the opinion posted by the Attorney General's office. ↗
- Hale v. Morgan (1978) 22 Cal.3d 388 Opinion text read on a free copy, not the official reporter. Confirm before relying on it. ↗
- People v. Dueñas (2019) 30 Cal.App.5th 1157 Opinion text read directly (slip opinion or free copy, not the bound official reporter). Confirm before relying on it. ↗
- Citizen research notes behind this site (Oct 16, 2026) Volunteer research notes (October 16-17, 2026), not published. Anything cited only to these notes is labeled Unverified. The link points to the City site because the notes have no public URL. ↗
- Raven v. Deukmejian (1990) 52 Cal.3d 336 Full opinion text read in the Caselaw Access Project copy. Quotes on this site were machine-checked against that text. ↗
- In re Lance W. (1985) 37 Cal.3d 873 Full opinion text read in the Caselaw Access Project copy. Quotes on this site were machine-checked against that text. ↗
- Government Code §36900 (city ordinance violations: misdemeanor unless made an infraction) Unofficial copy of the statute, read directly. Confirm on leginfo before relying on it. ↗
Page last updated: · Site last built: