9/68 CA Art XI: Local government

California Article XI: Local government, and why Williams can regulate at all

Lesson 9 of 68 · Local government and the city council · 20 min read

On this page (14 sections)
  1. Section 1: Counties
  2. Section 2: Cities
  3. Sections 3–6: Charters and municipal affairs
  4. Section 7: The police power
  5. Section 7.5: City measures can't carve out areas
  6. Section 9: City utilities
  7. Section 10: No extra pay; residency
  8. Section 11: No private control of city functions
  9. Sections 12–15: Claims, taxes, vehicle fees
  10. Every Article XI section
  11. In Williams
  12. Common misconceptions
  13. Check yourself
  14. Sources cited on this page

Article XI is the source of every Williams ordinance. Section 7 gives the city its police power. The same sentence limits it: no conflict with general laws Verified1.

Key takeaways

  • Williams "was made a General Law City on May 20, 1920" Verified2. It has no charter, so the "municipal affairs" protection of §5 doesn't apply.
  • §7: a city "may make and enforce within its limits all local, police, sanitary, and other ordinances and regulations not in conflict with general laws."
  • A local law conflicts if it "duplicates, contradicts, or enters an area fully occupied by general law" (Candid, Inland Empire).
  • §9 authorizes a city water system; §10 bars retroactive extra pay; §11 bars handing city functions to private bodies.

Section 1: Counties

Official textCal. Const., Art. XI, §1 — Counties—Formation, Boundaries, County Seat, Officers, and Governing Bodyread in context: Cal. Const., Art. XI, §1 — Counties—Formation, Boundaries, County Seat, Officers, and Governing Body

(a) The State is divided into counties which are legal subdivisions of the State. The Legislature shall prescribe uniform procedure for county formation, consolidation, and boundary change. Formation or consolidation requires approval by a majority of electors voting on the question in each affected county. A boundary change requires approval by the governing body of each affected county. No county seat shall be removed unless two-thirds of the qualified electors of the county, voting on the proposition at a general election, shall vote in favor of such removal. A proposition of removal shall not be submitted in the same county more than once in four years.

* New Article XI adopted June 2, 1970.

(b) The Legislature shall provide for county powers, an elected county sheriff, an elected district attorney, an elected assessor, and an elected governing body in each county. Except as provided in subdivision (b) of Section 4 of this article, each governing body shall prescribe by ordinance the compensation of its members, but the ordinance prescribing such compensation shall be subject to referendum. The Legislature or the governing body may provide for other officers whose compensation shall be prescribed by the governing body. The governing body shall provide for the number, compensation, tenure, and appointment of employees. [As amended June 7, 1988.]

Source: California Constitution as published by the California State Senate (current through November 5, 2024) Verified1

Counties are "legal subdivisions of the State" (§1(a)), and §1(b) requires an elected county sheriff and an elected district attorney Verified1. Williams sits in Colusa County Verified34.

Section 2: Cities

Official textCal. Const., Art. XI, §2 — Cities—Formation, Powersread in context: Cal. Const., Art. XI, §2 — Cities—Formation, Powers

(a) The Legislature shall prescribe uniform procedure for city formation and provide for city powers.

(b) Except with approval by a majority of its electors voting on the question, a city may not be annexed to or consolidated into another. [New section adopted June 2, 1970.]

Source: California Constitution as published by the California State Senate (current through November 5, 2024) Verified1

"The Legislature shall prescribe uniform procedure for city formation and provide for city powers" (§2(a)) Verified1. For a general law city the Government Code does that. "Cities organized under the general law shall be 'general law cities'" (Gov. Code §34102) Verified5. The government of a general law city is vested in a council "of at least five members," a city clerk, a city treasurer, a chief of police, a fire chief and subordinate officers (Gov. Code §36501) Verified6.

Sections 3–6: Charters and municipal affairs

Official textCal. Const., Art. XI, §3 — County or City—Chartersread in context: Cal. Const., Art. XI, §3 — County or City—Charters

(a) For its own government, a county or city may adopt a charter by majority vote of its electors voting on the question. The charter is effective when filed with the Secretary of State. A charter may be amended, revised, or repealed in the same manner. A charter, amendment, revision, or repeal thereof shall be published in the official state statutes. County charters adopted pursuant to this section shall supersede any existing charter and all laws inconsistent therewith. The provisions of a charter are the law of the State and have the force and effect of legislative enactments.

(b) The governing body or charter commission of a county or city may propose a charter or revision. Amendment or repeal may be proposed by initiative or by the governing body.

(c) An election to determine whether to draft or revise a charter and elect a charter commission may be required by initiative or by the governing body.

(d) If provisions of 2 or more measures approved at the same election conflict, those of the measure receiving the highest affirmative vote shall prevail. [As amended November 5, 1974.]

Source: California Constitution as published by the California State Senate (current through November 5, 2024) Verified1

Official textCal. Const., Art. XI, §5 — City Charters—Provisionsread in context: Cal. Const., Art. XI, §5 — City Charters—Provisions

(a) It shall be competent in any city charter to provide that the city governed thereunder may make and enforce all ordinances and regulations in respect to municipal affairs, subject only to restrictions and limitations provided in their several charters and in respect to other matters they shall be subject to general laws. City charters adopted pursuant to this Constitution shall supersede any existing charter, and with respect to municipal affairs shall supersede all laws inconsistent therewith.

(b) It shall be competent in all city charters to provide, in addition to those provisions allowable by this Constitution, and by the laws of the State for: (1) the constitution, regulation, and government of the city police force

(2) subgovernment in all or part of a city (3) conduct of city elections and

(4) plenary authority is hereby granted, subject only to the restrictions of this article, to provide therein or by amendment thereto, the manner in which, the method by which, the times at which, and the terms for which the several municipal officers and employees whose compensation is paid by the

city shall be elected or appointed, and for their removal, and for their compensation, and for the number of deputies, clerks and other employees that each shall have, and for the compensation, method of appointment, qualifications, tenure of office and removal of such deputies, clerks and other employees. [New section adopted June 2, 1970.]

Source: California Constitution as published by the California State Senate (current through November 5, 2024) Verified1

A charter city's charter "with respect to municipal affairs shall supersede all laws inconsistent therewith" (§5(a)) Verified1. Courts call this "home rule": it "reserves to charter cities the right to adopt and enforce ordinances that conflict with general state laws, provided the subject of the regulation is a 'municipal affair'" (Traders Sports, Inc. v. City of San Leandro (2001) 93 Cal.App.4th 37) Verified7. But "state law is supreme with respect to matters of 'statewide concern'" (State Building & Construction Trades Council of California v. City of Vista (2012) 54 Cal.4th 547, citing California Fed. Savings & Loan Assn. v. City of Los Angeles) Verified8.

For Williams: none of this applies until voters adopt a charter by "majority vote of its electors" (§3(a)) Verified1. A general law city has only the powers state law gives it.

Section 7: The police power

Official textCal. Const., Art. XI, §7 — Local Ordinances and Regulationsread in context: Cal. Const., Art. XI, §7 — Local Ordinances and Regulations

A county or city may make and enforce within its limits all local, police, sanitary, and other ordinances and regulations not in conflict with general laws. [New section adopted June 2, 1970.]

Source: California Constitution as published by the California State Senate (current through November 5, 2024) Verified1

What it gives. "This inherent local police power includes broad authority to determine, for purposes of the public health, safety, and welfare, the appropriate uses of land within a local jurisdiction's borders, and preemption by state law is not lightly presumed" (City of Riverside v. Inland Empire Patients Health & Wellness Center, Inc. (2013) 56 Cal.4th 729) Verified9. The Government Code says the same for general law cities: "The legislative body may pass ordinances not in conflict with the Constitution and laws of the State or the United States" (§37100) Verified10.

What limits it: preemption. "A conflict exists if the local legislation 'duplicates, contradicts, or enters an area fully occupied by general law, either expressly or by legislative implication'" (Candid Enterprises, Inc. v. Grossmont Union High School Dist. (1985) 39 Cal.3d 878; City of Riverside v. Inland Empire Patients Health & Wellness Center, Inc. (2013) 56 Cal.4th 729) Verified119.

Test Plain meaning Example from the cases
Duplicates Local law repeats state law Typically arises with local criminal laws copying state crimes
Contradicts Local law requires what state law forbids, or forbids what state law requires —
Fully occupied, expressly State says it alone regulates —
Fully occupied, by implication The state scheme is so complete there's no room Big Creek: county timber-location rules not preempted Verified12

Inland Empire (2013) held Riverside's zoning ban on medical marijuana dispensaries was not preempted by state medical marijuana laws Verified9. Big Creek (2006) asked whether county zoning rules on "the permissible locations for timber operations are preempted by state forestry statutes," and answered: "Concluding they are not" (Big Creek Lumber Co. v. County of Santa Cruz (2006) 38 Cal.4th 1139) Verified12.

Our reading: the empty example cells are honest: we list only examples we've verified. Whether a particular Williams ordinance is preempted is a legal question a court decides.

Section 7.5: City measures can't carve out areas

Official textCal. Const., Art. XI, §7.5 — Ballot Measures—Applicationread in context: Cal. Const., Art. XI, §7.5 — Ballot Measures—Application

(a) A city or county measure proposed by the legislative body of a city, charter city, county, or charter county and submitted to the voters for approval may not do either of the following:

(1) Include or exclude any part of the city, charter city, county, or charter county from the application or effect of its provisions based upon approval or disapproval of the city or county measure, or based upon the casting of a specified percentage of votes in favor of the measure, by the electors of the city, charter city, county, charter county, or any part thereof.

(2) Contain alternative or cumulative provisions wherein one or more of those provisions would become law depending upon the casting of a specified percentage of votes for or against the measure.

(b) “City or county measure,” as used in this section, means an advisory question, proposed charter or charter amendment, ordinance, proposition for the issuance of bonds, or other question or proposition submitted to the voters of a city, or to the voters of a county at an election held throughout an entire single county. [New section adopted June 2, 1998.]

Source: California Constitution as published by the California State Senate (current through November 5, 2024) Verified1

Section 9: City utilities

Official textCal. Const., Art. XI, §9 — Local Utilitiesread in context: Cal. Const., Art. XI, §9 — Local Utilities

(a) A municipal corporation may establish, purchase, and operate public works to furnish its inhabitants with light, water, power, heat, transportation, or means of communication. It may furnish those services outside its boundaries, except within another municipal corporation which furnishes the same service and does not consent.

(b) Persons or corporations may establish and operate works for supplying those services upon conditions and under regulations that the city may prescribe under its organic law. [New section adopted June 2, 1970.]

Source: California Constitution as published by the California State Senate (current through November 5, 2024) Verified1

"A municipal corporation may establish, purchase, and operate public works to furnish its inhabitants with light, water, power, heat, transportation, or means of communication" (§9(a)) Verified1. Charges for water and sewer service fall under Article XIII D, §6 Verified1. See Article XIII D.

Section 10: No extra pay; residency

Official textCal. Const., Art. XI, §10 — Local Government—Extra Compensation; City, County or District Employees—Residencyread in context: Cal. Const., Art. XI, §10 — Local Government—Extra Compensation; City, County or District Employees—Residency

(a) A local government body may not grant extra compensation or extra allowance to a public officer, public employee, or contractor after service has been rendered or a contract has been entered into and performed in whole or in part, or pay a claim under an agreement made without authority of law.

(b) A city or county, including any chartered city or chartered county, or public district, may not require that its employees be residents of such city, county, or district; except that such employees may be required to reside within a reasonable and specific distance of their place of employment or other designated location. [As amended June 8, 1976.]

Source: California Constitution as published by the California State Senate (current through November 5, 2024) Verified1

A city "may not require that its employees be residents of such city," but may require them "to reside within a reasonable and specific distance of their place of employment" (§10(b)) Verified1.

Section 11: No private control of city functions

Official textCal. Const., Art. XI, §11 — Private Control of County or Municipal Functions—Deposit and Investment of Public Moneysread in context: Cal. Const., Art. XI, §11 — Private Control of County or Municipal Functions—Deposit and Investment of Public Moneys

(a) The Legislature may not delegate to a private person or body power to make, control, appropriate, supervise, or interfere with county or municipal corporation improvements, money, or property, or to levy taxes or assessments, or perform municipal functions.

(b) The Legislature may, however, provide for the deposit of public moneys in any bank in this State or in any savings and loan association in this State or any credit union in this State or in any federally insured industrial loan company in this State and for payment of interest, principal, and redemption premiums of public bonds and other evidence of public indebtedness by banks within or without this State. It may also provide for investment of public moneys in securities and the registration of bonds and other

evidences of indebtedness by private persons or bodies, within or without this State, acting as trustees or fiscal agents. [As amended November 8, 1988.]

Source: California Constitution as published by the California State Senate (current through November 5, 2024) Verified1

The Legislature "may not delegate to a private person or body power to ... interfere with county or municipal corporation improvements, money, or property, or to levy taxes or assessments, or perform municipal functions" (§11(a)) Verified1. Our reading: a city may hire contractors, but core government power stays with public bodies.

Sections 12–15: Claims, taxes, vehicle fees

Official textCal. Const., Art. XI, §12 — Claims Against Counties or Cities, Etcread in context: Cal. Const., Art. XI, §12 — Claims Against Counties or Cities, Etc

The Legislature may prescribe procedure for presentation, consideration, and enforcement of claims against counties, cities, their officers, agents, or employees. [New section adopted June 2, 1970.]

Source: California Constitution as published by the California State Senate (current through November 5, 2024) Verified1

Official textCal. Const., Art. XI, §14 — Local Government—Taxationread in context: Cal. Const., Art. XI, §14 — Local Government—Taxation

A local government formed after the effective date of this section, the boundaries of which include all or part of two or more counties, shall not levy a property tax unless such tax has been approved by a majority vote of the qualified voters of that local government voting on the issue of the tax. [New section adopted November 2, 1976.]

Source: California Constitution as published by the California State Senate (current through November 5, 2024) Verified1

§12 is the basis for claim-filing rules before suing a city Verified1. §15 allocates vehicle license fee revenue to local governments Verified1.

Every Article XI section

Section Heading Status
§ 1 Counties—Formation, Boundaries, County Seat, Officers, and Governing Body In force
§ 2 (former) — Repealed June 2, 1970. See Section 2, below.
§ 2 Cities—Formation, Powers In force
§ 3 County or City—Charters In force
§ 4 County Charters—Provisions In force
§ 5 (former) — Repealed June 2, 1970. See Section 5, below.
§ 5 City Charters—Provisions In force
§ 5.1 (former) — Repealed June 2, 1970.
§ 6 (former) — Repealed June 2, 1970. See Section 6, below.
§ 6 Charter City and County In force
§ 7 (former) — Repealed June 2, 1970. See Section 7, below.
§ 7 Local Ordinances and Regulations In force
§ 7½ (former) — Repealed June 2, 1970.
§ 7.5 Ballot Measures—Application In force
§ 8 (former) — Repealed June 2, 1970. See Section 8, below.
§ 8 Counties—Performance of Municipal Functions In force
§ 8½ (former) — Repealed June 2, 1970.
§ 9 Local Utilities In force
§ 10 Local Government—Extra Compensation; City, County or District Employees—Residency In force
§ 10.5 (former) — Repealed June 8, 1976.
§ 11 Private Control of County or Municipal Functions—Deposit and Investment of Public Moneys In force
§ 12 (former) — As amended June 27, 1933, added to Article XIII as Section 37, June 2, 1970. See Section 12, below.
§ 12 Claims Against Counties or Cities, Etc In force
§ 13 (former) — Repealed June 2, 1970. See Section 13, below.
§ 13 Distribution of Powers—Construction of Article In force
§ 13½ — In force
§ 14 Local Government—Taxation In force
§ 15 Vehicle License Fee Allocations In force
§ 16 (former) — Added to Article XIII as Section 38, June 2, 1970.
§ 16½ — In force
§ 17 (former) — Repealed June 2, 1970.
§ 18 (former) — As amended November 8, 1949, added to Article XIII as Section 40, June 2, 1970.
§ 18¼ (former) — Repealed June 2, 1970.
§ 19 (former) — Repealed June 2, 1970.
§ 20 (former) — Repealed June 2, 1970.

Section headings and status come from the Senate's published text Verified1.

In Williams

  • Every WMC chapter rests on §7 and Gov. Code §37100 Verified110. Enforcement rules, such as making a violation a misdemeanor or infraction, come from Gov. Code §36900 Verified13.
  • Preemption challenges. If a WMC section contradicts a state statute, the state wins (§7) Verified1. See worked path.
  • Water service rests on §9 and is limited by XIII D §6 Verified1.
  • Ordinance procedure: five days between introduction and adoption (Gov. Code §36934) and effect 30 days after final passage (§36937) Verified1415.

Common misconceptions

  • "Cities have home rule." Only charter cities, and only for municipal affairs Verified17. Williams is general law Verified2.
  • "If the state has any law on a subject, cities can't touch it." No. Preemption "is not lightly presumed" Verified9.

Check yourself

Pick an answer for each question. You will see right away if it is right, and why.

Question 1. What kind of city is Williams, and since when?

Show the answer and why

A general law city since May 20, 1920 Verified2.

Question 2. What are the three ways a local law can conflict with state law?

Show the answer and why

It "duplicates, contradicts, or enters an area fully occupied by general law" Verified11.

Question 3. Can Williams require employees to live in the city?

Show the answer and why

No, but it can require them to live within a reasonable and specific distance (§10(b)) Verified1.

Question 4. Which section authorizes a city water system?

Show the answer and why

§9(a) Verified1.

Question 5. Scenario: Suppose the council wants to pass a new local sanitary rule. Can it?

Show the answer and why

Answer: Yes, under its police power, as long as the rule doesn't conflict with general laws.

§7 lets a city "make and enforce within its limits all local, police, sanitary, and other ordinances and regulations not in conflict with general laws." If a WMC section contradicts a state statute, the state wins.

From this lesson: “§7: a city "may make and enforce within its limits all local, police, sanitary, and other ordinances and regulations not in conflict with general laws."”

Sources cited on this page

  1. Constitutions of California and the United States, 2025-26 edition (PDF) (California State Senate; official; accessed 2026-10-17) California Constitution as last amended November 5, 2024. ↗
  2. Community page (“made a General Law City on May 20, 1920”) (City of Williams; official; accessed 2026-10-16) Says: “It was made a General Law City on May 20, 1920.” ↗
  3. Report of Registration as of September 4, 2026: Registration by Political Subdivision by County (California Secretary of State; official; accessed 2026-10-29) Lists Williams under Colusa County with 2,276 registered voters as of September 4, 2026 (60-day report before the Nov 3, 2026 election). Report index: https://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/report-registration/60day-general-2026 ↗
  4. E-1 Population Estimates for Cities, Counties and the State, January 1, 2025 and 2026 (California Department of Finance; official; accessed 2026-10-29) Williams (Colusa County): 5,595 on Jan 1, 2025 and 5,621 on Jan 1, 2026 (provisional), from the E-1 2026 workbook (E-1_2026_InternetVersion.xlsx). ↗
  5. Government Code §34102 (general law cities) (California.Public.Law (copy of California statute); unofficial / third-party; accessed 2026-10-23) Unofficial copy of the statute, read directly. Confirm on leginfo before relying on it. ↗
  6. Government Code §36501 (officers of a general law city) (California.Public.Law (copy of California statute); unofficial / third-party; accessed 2026-10-23) Unofficial copy of the statute, read directly. Confirm on leginfo before relying on it. ↗
  7. Traders Sports, Inc. v. City of San Leandro (2001) 93 Cal.App.4th 37 (Caselaw Access Project, Harvard Law School (copy of California opinion); unofficial / third-party; accessed 2026-10-23) Full opinion text read in the Caselaw Access Project copy. Quotes on this site were machine-checked against that text. ↗
  8. State Building & Construction Trades Council of California v. City of Vista (2012) 54 Cal.4th 547 (Caselaw Access Project, Harvard Law School (copy of California opinion); unofficial / third-party; accessed 2026-10-23) Full opinion text read in the Caselaw Access Project copy. Quotes on this site were machine-checked against that text. ↗
  9. City of Riverside v. Inland Empire Patients Health & Wellness Center, Inc. (2013) 56 Cal.4th 729 (Caselaw Access Project, Harvard Law School (copy of California opinion); unofficial / third-party; accessed 2026-10-23) Full opinion text read in the Caselaw Access Project copy. Quotes on this site were machine-checked against that text. ↗
  10. Government Code §37100 (ordinances not in conflict with state or federal law) (California.Public.Law (copy of California statute); unofficial / third-party; accessed 2026-10-23) Unofficial copy of the statute, read directly. Confirm on leginfo before relying on it. ↗
  11. Candid Enterprises, Inc. v. Grossmont Union High School Dist. (1985) 39 Cal.3d 878 (Caselaw Access Project, Harvard Law School (copy of California opinion); unofficial / third-party; accessed 2026-10-23) Full opinion text read in the Caselaw Access Project copy. Quotes on this site were machine-checked against that text. ↗
  12. Big Creek Lumber Co. v. County of Santa Cruz (2006) 38 Cal.4th 1139 (Caselaw Access Project, Harvard Law School (copy of California opinion); unofficial / third-party; accessed 2026-10-23) Full opinion text read in the Caselaw Access Project copy. Quotes on this site were machine-checked against that text. ↗
  13. Government Code §36900 (city ordinance violations: misdemeanor unless made an infraction) (California.Public.Law (copy of California statute); unofficial / third-party; accessed 2026-10-22) Unofficial copy of the statute, read directly. Confirm on leginfo before relying on it. ↗
  14. Government Code §36934 (ordinance adoption: reading and five-day rule) (California.Public.Law (copy of California statute); unofficial / third-party; accessed 2026-10-23) Unofficial copy of the statute, read directly. Confirm on leginfo before relying on it. ↗
  15. Government Code §36937 (when city ordinances take effect) (California.Public.Law (copy of California statute); unofficial / third-party; accessed 2026-10-23) Unofficial copy of the statute, read directly. Confirm on leginfo before relying on it. ↗

Page last updated: · Site last built: